Attribute our work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Confirm with your course coordinator or check your course profile before using Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) in your assessment. Some assessment pieces do not permit the use of AI tools, while others may allow AI with some limitations. If you use AI in your assessment without permission or appropriate acknowledgment it may be considered Academic Misconduct.
Any permitted use of generative AI for assessment must be acknowledged appropriately. Your course coordinator will provide guidance on how to reference the use of AI tools. Some examples include:
AI models sometimes produce incorrect, biased or outdated information. Verify the accuracy of AI-generated content using reliable sources before including it in your work.
Additionally, there may be legal or ethical issues to consider when using AI. Works created by non-humans are not eligible for copyright protection under Australian law. If you intend to publish work incorporating AI-generated content, check the publisher guidelines about what is allowed.
When interacting with AI models, you should be cautious about supplying sensitive information, including personal, confidential or propriety information or data.
Find out more about using AI tools in your studies.
You should acknowledge that you used generative AI in submitted assessment, including where you have directly quoted or paraphrased generative AI content or used tools to summarise readings, brainstorm ideas, plan your process, or for editing or proofreading purposes. It is recommended that you use an assignment coversheet to acknowledge your use of generative AI tools.
You should include the following information when acknowledging the use of generative AI tools:
Machine Translation for assignments provides more detailed guidance for acknowledging the use of translation tools.
This coversheet is an example of good practice in acknowledging the use of AI tools. Courses across UQ may have specific guidance you should follow on how to acknowledge the use of AI.
Yes. Generative AI and/or machine translation tools have been used to generate material in this document.
Tool | Use | Prompt(s) | Section | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
ChatGPT 4o | Initial idea generation that I adapted | Brainstorm ideas around how sustainable development goals can be applied locally | Framework on p 18 | 25 October 2024 |
Claude 3.5 | Generating a draft conclusion that I adapted | Provide a summary of Chapters 3, 4, and 5 | Conclusions (p 30, 31) | 25 October 2024 |
Grammarly EDU | Used to check spelling and grammar and edit my final document | Enhance my text to improve clarity and expression | Entire work | 8 November 2024 |
Microsoft Copilot | Used to modify the written tone/style of the introduction | Rewrite this paragraph so that the tone is appropriate for a university assignment | Introduction (p 2) | 8 November 2024 |
Where an assignment requires the use of generative AI tools to be cited, you must reference all the content from Generative AI tools that you include. Failure to reference externally sourced, non-original work can result in Academic misconduct.
References should provide clear and accurate information for each source and should identify where they have been used in your work.
Content from generative AI is a nonrecoverable source as it can't be retrieved or linked.
The following sections have examples of how to cite generative AI for different styles.
Based on APA Style guidance.
Author of generative AI model, Year of version used
Example:
(OpenAI, 2022)
OpenAI (2022)
Author of AI model used. (Year of AI model used). Name of AI model used (Version of AI model used) [Type or description of AI model used]. Web address of AI model used
Example:
OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT (Dec 20 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/
The full transcript of a response can be included in an appendix or other supplementary materials.
Visit How to cite ChatGPT for more information.
Essentially use rule 7.12 that covers written correspondence. This is included in the bibliography (rule 1.13). Include the name of the creator and recipient first.
OpenAI, ChatGPT to Fred Jones, Output, 24 February 2023.
Note:
Number Output from [program], [creator] to [recipient], [full date].
1Output from ChatGPT, OpenAI to Fred Jones, 24 February 2023.
Text explaining the prompt that was used can be included in the footnote. The full detail can also be included in an appendix.
1 Output from ChatGPT, OpenAI to Fred Jones, 24 February 2023. The output was generated in response to the prompt, ‘What is the history of the Law School at The University of Queensland’: see below Appendix C.
The Chicago Manual of Style Online provides guidance on citing and documenting sources derived from generative artificial intelligence.
When using an author-date style, you should include the author of the generative AI model and date in parentheses unless it is mentioned in-text e.g. (Microsoft Copilot, 30 July 2024).
Author, response to [prompt], Publisher, Day Month Year.
1. ChatGPT, response to "Describe the symbolism of the green light in the book The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald,” OpenAI, 7 February 2023.
2. Text generated from ChatGPT, OpenAI, 7 February 2023.
If you have included your prompt in-text there is no need to repeat it in the note.
Guidance based on How do I cite generative AI in MLA style? from the official style website.
(Short form Title of source)
(“Describe the symbolism”)
“Title of source” prompt. Name of AI Tool, version, Company, Date content was generated, General web address of tool.
“Describe the symbolism of the green light in the book The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald” prompt. ChatGPT, 13 Feb. version, OpenAI, 8 Mar. 2023, chat.openai.com/chat.
The text of your document must include:
In an online chat with OpenAI's ChatGPT AI language model (7 February 2023) ...
Generative AI tools can be cited in the text of your work by specifying:
On August 5, 2024 the pre-determined questions were entered into ChatGPT (GPT-4-turbo, OpenAI) and the responses recorded for analysis.
In an online chat with Microsoft's Copilot AI language model (February 7, 2023) ...
Different publishers are taking different approaches to whether generative AI is allowed.
If you are writing for publication, you should check the publisher's information for authors.